AgentSey

Software, built by agents.

A factory of agents does the work. Your experts set the direction and decide what matters.

See pricing
01
Product
spec from intent
02
Plan
task decomposition
03
Implement
code against spec
04
QA
tests, regressions
05
Security
adversarial probing
06
Verify
proof of (code, spec)
07
Deploy
staged rollout
Agents do the work
hundreds running in parallel
People direct it
they make the decisions that matter
People and agents in sync
one smooth flow across the company
§ The shift

The bottleneck was always the people.

Every AI tool so far still puts a person in the loop, so the whole line waits on them. Take people off the line and nothing waits anymore.

Human-centric
every other tool
People are the line and the bottleneck.
Everything waitson a person at every step
Agent-centric
AgentSey
Agents are the line. The bottleneck is gone.
Nothing waitsagents never stop
humanagenttask
§ How it works

Four ideas the factory is built on.

01

Many agents at once

Every step runs a whole swarm of agents in parallel, each coming at the same work from a different angle.

01020304050607
02

Nothing ships unchecked

Before any change ships it gets checked, and whatever does not hold up goes straight back to be redone.

in · 100%verified · 78%cycle · 22%
03

The whole codebase in reach

Agents can pull from your entire codebase and its history, without the cost of holding all of it in memory at once.

DRAM 12 GB · hot scratchNVMe 480 GB · graphs + proofsArchive 22 TB · cold proofs
04

Fixes that compound

Fix something once and it becomes a rule the whole factory follows from then on, on every project after.

1 fixapplied across every repo in your org
§ Console

What a run looks like.

One screen for the whole run. You watch the work move, and step in wherever a decision needs you.

agentsey.ai/run/****58
Run · rn-3358 · vega-pay/checkout-api
Idempotent retries for webhook delivery
running · 11:38
elapsed
11:42
started 19:02
spent
$4.23
est. $14-18 total
agents
186
across 7 stations
verify q.
2
d1 cycling · d2 probing
01
Product
02
Plan
03
Implement
04
QA
05
Security
06
Verify
07
Deploy
FX2
PR8
RX1
DB4
verify gate · holding d1 · cycling under mr-184
§ Quality

Same task. We get all of it done.

doneleft undonethe only difference is how many agents run
Other tools
one model on the task
done
0 / 47
0% done
1 agents$0.00 spent0% done
AgentSey
many agents on the same task
done
0 / 47
0% done
40 agents$0.00 spent0% done

Give one model a real task and it only ever gets through part of it. There is more there than it can hold at once. Split the same task across many small agents, each on its own piece, and the whole thing gets done. Same task, far more finished.

// inference

358 agents against your codebase, for less than a single frontier session.

Running this many agents at once only makes sense if each one is cheap to run. So we built our own inference stack for it: most of the work runs on small models we train in-house, and the frontier model gets called in only where it actually pays off.

01
357
small specialized models
sizes from 1.5B to 13B
02
1
frontier model
called in sparingly
03
10-100x
cheaper to run
vs one frontier model at the same coverage
// cost to cover the whole codebase
Compared with one frontier model at the same coverage.
illustrative
Frontier-only$1.00
Hybrid (1 + small)$0.38
AgentSey$0.04
The same GPU hour that serves one chat response serves hundreds of agent steps in our scheduler.